Monday Mon Feb 4 2002, 8.30-9.30 PT Chair: Marc Hadley
There are two questions: The first question is when to use itemtype but the rewrite of arracy encoding has changed that from MUST to MAY so the issue has gone away The other question is regarding the fact that one can't use anonymous types. ACTION: Asir: write a note for the SOAP encoding section pointing out that a result of using anonymous types is that one can't refer to them from the SOAP encoding and send to dist-app
DavidF has an action item on this ACTION: Asir: talk to DavidF to ask him what the status is. Schema vs. Encoding: ACTION: Henrik: write a clarifying text of why we use the schemas as examples and then send that to the ETF and Gudge for first input.
Subsumed by Asir's item - DF contact Schema experts re issue #163 Done - JK contact Asir about i167 - whether it still stands and what it actually means Done - MH write a response to Gudge's email; propose to remove Schema from Encoding examples, add C-style code; in connection with issue 17 ??? JK to write the proposal for 168 that if a receiver cannot get the type, it MAY fault with the subcode enc:UntypedValue Done - HFN to change the "object" to "node" in data model text